Home Thursday Thoughts Squeezing the corporate build until engineers smuggle in their own laptops
Business figures in a corporate concept illustration

Squeezing the corporate build until engineers smuggle in their own laptops

In this article

Corporate laptops are now so locked down that site engineers quietly pull out their own personal laptops because they’re worried they won’t be able to do their job with the standard build. I’ve watched this happen on real sites.

In OT, that means unmanaged, unpatched, unknown endpoints are walking straight into plants, substations and control rooms and plugging into the most sensitive networks you own.

Why this is a problem (beyond policy)

Personal laptops are rarely hardened to an OT standard: no baselines, no central logging, no proper EDR, and often significantly out-of-date software.

BYO devices are a perfect delivery mechanism for malware into engineering workstations and control networks, especially when USB and removable media are still the main way to move configs, firmware and logic.

Once a “trusted” engineer device is on a flat or weakly segmented OT network, it can become a bridge between internet-exposed IT services and safety-critical systems.

The harder we squeeze the corporate build, the more we incentivise a shadow IT culture that quietly routes around all that good policy work.

What we’d rather not admit: Over-restrictive controls are still risky controls.

If an engineer genuinely believes they can’t load a new vendor tool, apply a hotfix on a night shift, or pull logs or upload a temporary script or license, they will find another way.

In the field, “mission success” usually wins over “policy compliance”.

A better OT-centric approach

If we’re serious about OT cyber, we need to design usable security for the people who keep the lights on:

Provide a clearly defined “engineering laptop” pattern: hardened, monitored, but with the tools and privileges required for field work, including offline scenarios.
Wrap that device in controls that match IEC 62443 intent: network zoning, application whitelisting, strict removable-media workflows and malware scanning at every crossing point.
Make the secure path the easiest path: fast exceptions, pre-approved tool catalogues, and clear, documented ways to get “that one vendor utility” onto a box without sneaking in a personal device.

When engineers trust the corporate build to let them succeed, the temptation to reach for a personal laptop drops dramatically.

Have a good week,
Damien Pope

Need help securing your OT environment? IEC 62443 • Essential Eight • Gap analysis • Network segmentation • OT incident response and more – Talk to us

Related Posts

Supermarket refrigeration and freezer aisle

Cyber resilience is becoming a kitchen conversation

Governments are asking households to keep days of food and water on hand, while attacks on supermarket refrigeration show what legacy, internet-facing OT with default passwords can do. Why consequence, access and visibility matter more than the next AI headline.
Container ship at port with gantry cranes

Can we prevent every compromise?

Can critical infrastructure keep delivering a service safely when parts of the environment can no longer be trusted? What ASD's CI Fortify guidance means for OT isolation, recovery and resilience.
Wind turbines on a green coastal headland

OT Cybersecurity Risk Assessment: A Practical Guide

A practical guide to OT cybersecurity maintenance—what industrial teams should review, test and maintain to keep security controls effective over time.